Monday, June 12, 2006

Last Year's Focus Papers...

One paper that quickly caught my eye was on charter schools. I have 2 younger siblings that have been in a charter school for a year now and are going to start at a new charter school in the fall, so this topic really hits home (yay for real-life connections). So the paper on charter schools was saying that one way to better our public schools is to give them more competition (the charter schools being the competition). I'm not exactly sure what the competing forces are though: is it the public school trying to prove it's just as good as the charter school so the public school administration begins to crack down on the students and teachers and school policies? Or is it something more personal, like the students themselves want to prove they're just as smart as charter school kids or something so they step it up a notch? Maybe it's a mix of the two. But anyways...

As I was reading the paper, I couldn't help but wonder why any school would need any form of competition in order to [start trying to] be[come] a good school. The thought bothers me. There are certain telltale signs that let a school know that it's failing itself, its students and its community. The proximity of a charter school should make no difference. Why is the public school not taking a greater initiative to fix its problems? Does it even know it's problems? No? Well why not?
I am not against charter schools. In fact I think I'm generally in favor of charter schools. But it seems like too often suggestions are made for fixing the public school system and/or its academically malnourished youth that don't actually fix the schools. Not really. Instead of the schools holding themselves truly accountable for the betterment of their students thinking minds, they continue to promote students to higher grade levels while ignoring the fact that those students don't deserve any kind of a promotion (much more often a demotion). Parents don't help the situation when they don't demand more of the faculties and administrations of the schools they send their kids to; so instead of making these demands, parents (the ones that care) remove their children from the public school system, and put them in charter, magnet or private schools, leaving the public schools just as bad as it was before. This is just a solution to the problem but doesn't fix it.
For example, I know of this program called Prep for Prep. It takes young children in elementary public schools that show considerable academic achievement and puts them through 14 straight months of extra schooling (there's even school 5 days-a-week during both summers), by the end of which they will have found placement in a private school. The start attending that private school in 7th grade and mostly continue to attend private schools for the rest of their academic lives. It's a really good program, I know a number of people that went through Prep for Prep and reaped the benefits of the program (there's a lot more to Prep than those 14 months). But despite how good the program is, taking students out of the public school system shouldn't be the answer. Again, it does not attack the root of the problem, just works around it.
But now, what if the parents think the best thing for their child is to put him or her through a program like Prep for Prep or switch the child into a different schooling system? Because quite frankly, I could easily see myself moving my child from a public school system to a charter, magnet or private school in the future if the state of public schools in the US doesn't change. Can you really blame parents that actually care for wanting the best for their children and not wanting to wait for public schools to become the best? I feel like you can't. So much more weight falls on the shoulders of public school administrations and faculties to improve their schools. And if the only way to get public schools to make any progress is by an outside stimulus like a competing school, then that wait for public schools to be the best option for students is going to be quite a long one. But it is somewhat comforting to know that there are programs like the Mississippi Teacher Corps and teachers like the ones I've met these here these past two weeks that are trying to make that wait a little bit shorter...

1 Comments:

At 10:00 PM, Blogger dd adams said...

tricky subject matter - in my experience (my hometown), there really hasnt been all that much 'competition' between the established public and new charter school. they simply coexist, perhaps similarly to the way two high schools are often shared by one town in the delta. funds go to the one that performs better (as a reward, per se), but like aaron wrote in his blog on the nclb act - this is a self-perpetuating cycle (which is the subversive idea here in mississippi - to keep one down, while the other enjoys relative success) ...

been a pleasure teaching with you miss raji ... hope the rash goes away!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home